Home Washington Report Is It National Security Or Aircraft Noise?

Is It National Security Or Aircraft Noise?

MA legislator wants FAA to wring more personal information from aircraft owners.

In a world already brimming with physical and cyber-security threats to aviation, a Massachusetts congressman introduced legislation that would enable terrorists or criminals to access even more sensitive information about registered aircraft owners in the U.S.
Data in the FAA Aircraft Registry have been available for years on the opening page of the agency’s web site. Finding the owner of a particular aircraft is as simple as typing in the N-number – and up pops the serial number, manufacturer, model, and name and address of the registered owner.

For a variety of legitimate reasons – privacy and liability concerns, business and personal security, insurance considerations – many aircraft owners create subsidiaries or stand-alone entities that are listed as the registered owners of aircraft assets. FAA regulators and law enforcement agencies can quickly determine the beneficial owners of aircraft when necessary. Aircraft security experts have long advocated registering an aircraft in the name of an entity not directly linked to the owner, to help protect against individuals or organizations with nefarious intent.

Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-MA) wants to strip away that layer of protection. In July he introduced the “Aircraft Ownership Transparency Act of 2017,” H.R.3544. Before an aircraft could be registered, Lynch’s bill would require the FAA Administrator to “identify each beneficial owner of the covered entity by name; current residential or business street address; a unique identifying number from a nonexpired passport issued by the United States or a nonexpired drivers license issued by a state…”
In addition, in the case of a covered entity owned or controlled by more than one entity, H.R.3544 would require FAA to “identify how each entity relates to every other entity, including the extent to which each entity holds an ownership interest in or exercises control over another entity, and the relationship of each such entity with the beneficial owners who are natural persons; and in addition to each beneficial owner, identify each trust grantor, trustee, trust protector, and beneficiary owner of the covered entity that is a foreign person.”

This summer Lynch and Rep. Peter King (R-NY), asked the Government Accountability Office to examine “how FAA assesses and manages risks related to the eligibility requirements of its aircraft registration program.” But their letter cited only three instances of suspicious or possibly illegal activity related to aircraft registration issues: in October 2006, March 2010, and January 2012. Considering more than 200,000 aircraft are listed on the FAA Registry, three questionable registrations in a decade does not sound like a major problem requiring new legislation.
It is probably worth noting there are a lot of voters in Lynch’s congressional district who are adamantly opposed to aircraft noise. According to Massport, more than 19,000 noise complaints – some 46 percent of the total filed about operations at Boston Logan Airport during the first eight months of 2017 – came from constituents in Lynch’s 8th congressional district.

In October, Lynch introduced another bill, the “Air Traffic Noise and Pollution Expert Consensus Act of 2017,” H.R. 3938. That measure would require FAA “to sponsor an Expert Consensus Report issued by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine on the health effects of airplanes flying over residential areas.”

Citing a four-fold jump in noise complaints to Massport since 2015, Lynch attributed the increase to flight path shifts implemented as part of the NextGen air traffic control modernization program. “There is clear demand from our constituents that we look into the impact of new flight paths… It is imperative that we understand and remedy any health effects caused by aircraft flying over residential areas, and the onus is on the FAA to produce this information,” Lynch said.
Apparently no breach of your personal privacy, or imposition of new make-work projects on FAA, is too much to demand when Rep. Lynch is trying to impress his constituents. BAA

David Collogan has covered aviation in Washington, DC for more than four decades. This award-wining journalist is known as one of the most knowledgeable, balanced, wary, and trusted journalists in the aviation community.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here